This week marks the fifteen anniversary of San Francisco’s first Critical Mass. “Critical Mass” is a term used to describe an event where multitudes of bikers take to the streets at one time to celebrate biking and to show the potent force that many bikers can have, if joined together en mass.
The original organizers of these events in San Francisco wanted to bring attention to biking. Many bikers die every year in accidents with automobiles. Since automobiles most often are the ones that dominate roadways, the event could be considered the equivalent of thumbing your nose at cars.
Now, fifteen years later, questions remain as to the true power of the Critical Mass.
There are many benefits to a Critical Mass, but there are also a number of serious drawbacks. Let’s start with the benefits:
Brings awareness to the issue;
Creates an important social opportunity for bikers, who are often marginalized and heckled by motorists; and
An opportunity of empowerment through sheer numbers.
Now the drawbacks:
Creates a sense of animosity from drivers towards bikers (bad idea: cars usually win encounters);
It’s a very passive-aggressive statement;
A few bad apples can spoil it for everyone; and
It is more of an inward expression of bonding than an invitation to join in.
Number four might offend folks who support critical mass, and it really depends on how the event is held. In San Francisco, for example, the events have become controversial because some bikers have taken Critical Mass as an opportunity to express raw anger at others. Conversely, drivers have taken to yelling obscenities at the bikers.
Nether side is blameless and this leads us to our main point: Critical Mass brings a lot of attention to biking in a community. If the biking community is ready for the criticism and has a good handle on how the spin goes, such events will be successful and biking organizations will benefit from increased support and membership as a result. On the other hand, if you are content just ’sticking it to the man’, well, then, so be it..
For more on this issue, read up over at the San Francisco Chronicle.
~ms